Freitag, 2. Januar 2026
Clinton, Gaddafi and Louis Farrakhan
Bill Clinton was just as vicious and racist as Donald J. Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu.
Read the report carefully and impartially and form your own opinion.
Also, consider how Bill and Hillary Clinton handled Haiti. Bill and Hillary Clinton's involvement in Haiti is a controversial issue, primarily linked to disaster relief efforts following the 2010 earthquake.
Even before the earthquake, Bill Clinton served as the UN Special Envoy for Haiti after the 2008 hurricanes and promoted economic development.
As president, he authorized a US invasion in 1994 to reinstate the elected President Aristide.
After the earthquake, which claimed over 200,000 lives, Bill Clinton became co-chairman of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC), which was tasked with coordinating $13 billion in aid. Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, oversaw US aid and traveled to Haiti in 2011 to influence elections.
Critics allege that much of the money flowed to international NGOs and companies instead of to Haitians – with accusations of corruption, moldy Clinton Foundation trailers, and padded contracts.
The Clintons deny these allegations and emphasize direct aid distribution without personal profit.
Nevertheless, the reconstruction remains incomplete, with persistent poverty.
The Netardashals-Sick Mentality.
Gaddafi made this promise during a visit to Niger. At this meeting, Gaddafi promised Farrakhan a donation of US$1 billion. That was in 1996.
Louis Farrakhan (the longtime leader of the Nation of Islam (NOI), a Black nationalist religious movement in the United States. Born Louis Eugene Walcott on May 11, 1933, he rose through the ranks of the NOI under Elijah Muhammad and became a prominent preacher after Malcolm X's departure and assassination) publicly pledged one billion dollars to empower African Americans, fund education, businesses, and strengthen local communities. He called it a "breakthrough" in America's wall, a direct blow against US imperialism from a hostile state. But the money never arrived.
Days later, the US Treasury Department (OFAC) abruptly halted the deal. The reason? Libya had been on the state's list of state sponsors of terrorism, Pan Am 103, since 1986 and was subject to sanctions. The argument was that accepting the money would damage US foreign policy.
Critics cried "foreign interference."
Supporters whispered, “They blocked the economic freedom of Black people because the money came from the wrong source.”
Farrakhan sued and lost.
After years of fighting, he received a reduced fee of $250,000, but the billion dollars never arrived. Estimates and reports suggest sums between $20 million and $250 million flowed through various channels and in installments. Much of this money was used to fund the growth of businesses, media outlets (such as the newspaper The Final Call), and real estate owned by the Nation of Islam.
Accepting the money further isolated Farrakhan from the mainstream of American politics and society and, in the eyes of his critics, confirmed his role as a radical and anti-American figure.
Ask yourself: Why would anyone immediately reject a donation intended to improve the lives of Black people simply because it came from an enemy of the United States? Who truly feared an independent, funded Black movement? They don't care about people at all; they just want obedient slaves. They're keeping the Blacks in check. And the sheep don't even notice!
The BLACK News
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)

Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen